Sunday, August 24, 2008

Virgin Flair

Virgin Blue like to portray themselves as hip and with-it, their staff are brash and flippant, and they've been found to have engaged in discriminatory hiring practices at the Queens-bloody-land Anti Discrimination Tribunal. We should've know better...

Sunday 2nd September, 2007

Manager, Customer Relations
VIRGIN BLUE
PO Box 1034
Spring Hill QLD 4004
Australia

RE: ‘GUEST’ (sic) RELATIONS & ‘BAGGAGE BLUES’ (sic)

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to complain about the thoroughly miserable experience my partner Francis and I endured flying Virgin Blue to Melbourne on Sunday 26th August and returning to Brisbane on Thursday 30th August.

The misery began some weeks before the flight when my partner, who has cerebral palsy, had to endure again a protracted interrogation from the staff at the ‘Guest Contact Centre’ when she made a reservation to accompany me to Melbourne. The asked her again a broad range of probing questions on the nature of her disability and the assistance she may require getting to and from her seat. This flippant, cocky man smugly asked for several assurances that she isn't travelling alone as “Virgin Blue require you to travel with a carer”. There was also again a lengthy discussion on the technical details of her power wheelchair – what type of battery it has, how heavy it is, its height, length and width, etc. These are questions asked by your competitor Qantas once. They then enter these details on their computers and all staff are then automatically aware of her requirements. They provide a commissionaire (or even two) to assist her getting into and out of her seat, allow her to travel alone, and do not need to repeatedly ask if she can walk.

Your reservation staff have been given the details they ask several times. This information should be recorded in your computer and pop-up each time she makes a booking or arrives at a departure gate. It is a tiresome chore to have to tell all the arrogant, conceited Virgin Blue staff that, “No my partner can't walk...” and “Yes, I will assist her into her seat...”

We certainly didn't feel like guests!

And then, Virgin Blue staff left her wheelchair in Brisbane.

We were encouraged by the Virgin Blue staff to use my partner's manual wheelchair to get to the departure gate and to the door of the aircraft. Natasha and the crew of DJ 308 assured us that the wheelchair would be bought straight up on arrival in Melbourne for our immediate use. When it failed to materialise at the door when we disembarked, we thought it had been taken with the rest of the luggage to the carousels and oversize luggage pick-up area and so we attempted to collect it there only to be told that it had been left in Brisbane.

‘Baggage Blues’ does not quite cover the seriousness of someone's wheelchair being left behind, and this seems to be a concept completely alien to Virgin Blue staff, including the lost luggage manager Trent who made no attempt to apologise or acknowledge the gravity of the situation. Indeed, his quip that “This happens all the time” indicates a corporate culture that is completely disconnected from the needs of customers who aren't cut from the same cloth as themselves.
So, in essence, my complaint revolves around these clear deficiencies in Virgin Blue's treatment of it's ‘guests’:
  • Its inability to record my partner's information in a way that communicates her needs to all staff efficiently and respectfully is demeaning and discriminatory;
  • Its insistence (for whatever reason) that she not travel alone is discriminatory;
  • Its flight crew's negligence in failing to load my partners wheelchair is a gross dereliction of duty and indicative of a corporate lack of consideration for people with disabilities; and
  • Its luggage handling staff's callous refusal to take our concerns seriously indicate a corporate culture that is narcissistic and brainwashed by its own advertising propaganda.

Be assured, we will “get what we want” by never again flying on your substandard airline where, despite your discourse, we have never felt like ‘guests’.

Yours in bitter disappointment,

(v_quixotic)

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Oils aint oils...

A Complaint about a television advertisement that showed an oil bottle leering a a woman in a bikini:

Monday 18 February 2008

Marketing Director
Castrol Australia Pty Limited
132 McCredie Road
Guildford NSW 2161

RE: Castrol Magnatec television commercial featuring Adam Gilchrist

Dear Sir/Madam

I wish to make a complaint about the currently aired advertisement for Castrol Magnatec engine oil featuring Australian international cricketer of renown, Adam Gilchrist. Therefore, I am writing both to you and the Advertising Standards Bureau explaining why this advertisement is inappropriate in its current form and requesting its correction before future airings.

Whilst I have no objection to athletes endorsing products unrelated to their sporting endeavours and their fields of expertise, I do find it offensive when such endorsements feature behaviour that might constitute sexual harassment and reinforce sexist stereotypes.

The objectionable sequence involves an animated oil bottle, finding itself bounced from the tray of Mr Gilchrist's utility, flying through several domestic back yards in order to intercept its no doubt bereft owner further in his journey. Ostensibly, this sequence is mildly amusing as such chase sequences involving pursuers racing through houses and yards to head their quarry off at the pass are a popular culture cliché. However, it is perplexing and disappointing to find the lost and anxious oil bottle pausing in its flight to ... leer ... at two young women in bathing costumes before resuming its journey.

If any human protagonists were to imitate this behaviour, they would be liable to complaints of sexual harassment, an offence under the Commonwealth
Sex Discrimination Act 1984 and the analogous state anti-discrimination legislation. The subjects of such complaints can be called before the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission and face civil prosecution in the Federal Magistrate’s Court.

Section 28A of that Act declares sexual harassment as having occurred if:
(a) [a] person makes an unwelcome sexual advance, or an unwelcome request for sexual favours, to the person harassed; or

(b) engages in other unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature in relation to the person harassed;

in circumstances in which a reasonable person, having regard to all the circumstances, would have anticipated that the person harassed would be offended, humiliated or intimidated.

As a ‘reasonable person’, I would consider invading a young woman’s privacy by leaping over a her back fence and, finding her and her associate clad only in their bathing costumes, leering at them before making a hasty escape to be unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature. Further, it is ‘reasonable’ to anticipate the young women in question would be offended, humiliated or intimidated by such behaviour.

Not only is it regrettable for an advertisement for engine oil to feature sexual harassment, it is also disappointing for utility drivers and male athletes to be depicted, by the proxy of their oil bottles’ behaviour, as unreformed misogynists.

Professional male athletes of all sporting codes are under intense media scrutiny and reports of their sexual misdemeanours have frequently wrecked their careers and personal lives in addition to the harm this conduct causes the female recipients of their unwelcome advances. In this context, advertisements like yours for Castrol Magnatec oil and many others produced by the motoring industry send confusing messages by apparently endorsing the oafish blokey behaviour which gets so many young men into so much trouble.

If your oil is as good as you claim, if it truly contains “intelligent molecules” that “protect your engine from the moment you turn the key”, you should not need to associate your product with the sexual desires of your most ignorant and unrefined customers.

I therefore request that you withdraw this commercial in its current form and refrain from airing it until the offensive scene in the chase sequence is edited from it.

Yours sincerely

etc.


The response of the advertising complaints board in a future post.